posted on 2022-03-28, 19:10authored bySridharan Raghavan, Theodore Warsavage, Wenhui G. Liu, Katherine Raffle, Kevin Josey, David R. Saxon, Lawrence S. Phillips, Liron Caplan, Jane E.B. Reusch
<b>Objective:</b> Therapeutic
inertia threatens the potential long-term benefits of achieving early glycemic
control after type 2 diabetes diagnosis. We evaluated temporal trends in
second-line diabetes medication initiation among individuals initially treated
with metformin.
<p><b> </b></p>
<p><b>Research
design and methods:</b> We included data from 199,042 adults with type
2 diabetes in the US Veterans Affairs Health Care System initially treated with
metformin monotherapy from 2005 to 2013. We used multivariable Cox proportional
hazards and linear regression to estimate associations of year of metformin
monotherapy initiation with time to second-line diabetes treatment over five
years of follow-up (primary outcome) and with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at the
time of second-line diabetes treatment initiation (secondary outcome).</p>
<p><b> </b></p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The
cumulative five-year incidence of second-line medication initiation declined
from 47% among metformin initiators in 2005 to 36% in 2013 counterparts (<i>P</i><0.0001)
despite a gradual increase in mean HbA1c at the end of follow-up (from 6.94±1.28%
to 7.09±1.42%, trend <i>P</i><0.0001). Compared to metformin monotherapy
initiators in 2005, adjusted hazard ratios for five-year initiation of
second-line diabetes treatment ranged from 0.90 [95% CI 0.87, 0.92] in 2006 metformin
initiators to 0.68 [0.66, 0.70] in 2013 counterparts. Among those receiving
second-line treatment within five years of metformin initiation, HbA1c at
second-line medication initiation increased from 7.74±1.66% in 2005 metformin
initiators to 8.55±1.92% in 2013 counterparts (trend <i>P</i><0.0001).</p>
<p><b> </b></p>
<b>Conclusions:</b> We observed
progressive delays in diabetes treatment intensification consistent with
therapeutic inertia. Process of care interventions early in the diabetes
disease course may be needed to reverse adverse temporal trends in diabetes
care.
Funding
SR receives research support from US Department of Veterans Affairs award IK2-CX001907, from the Webb-Waring Biomedical Research Program of the Boettcher Foundation, and from US NIH award P30DK116073. JEBR receives research support from US Department of Veterans Affairs award CX001532 and from US NIH award P30 DK116073.The sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. This work is not intended to reflect the official opinion of the US Department of Veterans Affairs or the U.S. government.