American Diabetes Association
Browse

Subphenotype-dependent benefits of bariatric surgery for individuals at risk for type 2 diabetes

Download (2.31 MB)
Version 2 2025-04-14, 19:38
Version 1 2025-04-11, 14:51
figure
posted on 2025-04-14, 19:38 authored by Leontine Sandforth, Violeta Raverdy, Arvid Sandforth, Pierre Bauvin, Estelle Chatelain, Helene Verkindt, Geltrude Mingrone, Caterina Guidone, Ornella Verrastro, Karin Zhou, Rami Archid, André Mihaljevic, Robert Caiazzo, Gregory Baud, Camille Marciniak, Mikael Chetboun, Marlene Ganslmeier, Vitória Minelli Faiao, Martin Heni, Louise Fritsche, Anja Moller, Konstantinos Kantartzis, Andreas Peter, Rainer Lehmann, Robert Wagner, Katsiaryna Prystupa, Andreas Fritsche, Norbert Stefan, Hubert Preissl, Andreas L Birkenfeld, Reiner Jumpertz von Schwartzenberg, François Pattou

Objective

Bariatric surgery (BS) is an effective treatment option for individuals with obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, whether outcomes in subtypes of individuals at risk for T2D and/or comorbidities (Tübingen Clusters) differ, is unknown. Of these, clusters 5 and 6 (C5, C6) are high-risk clusters for developing T2D and/or comorbidities, while cluster 4 (C4) is a low-risk cluster. We investigated BS outcomes, hypothesizing high-risk clusters benefit most due to great potential for metabolic improvement.

Research Design and Methods

We allocated participants without T2D but at risk for T2D, defined by elevated BMI, to the Tübingen Clusters. Participants had normal glucose regulation or prediabetes according to American Diabetes Association criteria. Two cohorts underwent BS: A discovery (Lille, France) and a replication cohort (Rome, Italy). A control cohort (Tübingen, Germany) received behavioral modification counseling. Main outcomes included glucose regulation and prediabetes remission.

Results

In the discovery cohort, 15.0% of participants (n=121) were allocated to C4, 22.3% (n=180) to C5, and 62.4% (n=503) to C6. Relative body weight loss was similar between all clusters, however C5 most strongly reduced insulin resistance and improved beta-cell function. Prediabetes remission rate was lowest in low-risk C4 and highest in high-risk C5. Individuals from high-risk clusters changed to low-risk clusters in all BS cohorts but not in the control cohort.

Conclusions

Participants in C5 had the highest benefit from BS in terms of improvement in insulin resistance, beta-cell function and prediabetes remission. This novel classification might help identify individuals who will benefit specifically from BS.

Funding

This project was financially supported by the European Commission (FEDER 12003944), Agence National de la Recherche (European Genomic Institute for Diabetes, ANR-10-LABX-46, and Precinash-16-RHUS-0006), Fondation Coeur et Arteres (FCA R15112EE), Fondation Francophone pour la Recherche sur le Diabète (FFRD-2015) and grant agreements with the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking 115317 (DIRECT) and 115881 (RHAPSODY) supported by the EU Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) and The European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) companies. Furthermore, the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement 875534. The Stratification of Obesity Phenotypes to Optimize Future Obesity Therapy (SOPHIA) project was supported by the EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation program and EFPIA and Type 1 Diabetes Exchange, Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation and Obesity Action Coalition. This work was moreover supported by the German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD, 01GI0925) via the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, and Helmholtz Munich. Additionally, R.J.v.S. was supported by a Helmholtz Young Investigator Group (VH-NG-1619) of the Helmholtz Center Munich and the Helmholtz Society and the Cluster of Excellence Controlling Microbes to Fight Infections (03.007). A.L.B is supported by grants from the German Research Foundation (GRK2816; BI1292/9-1). L.S. is supported by the German Research Association as a Clinician Scientist.

History

Usage metrics

    Diabetes Care

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC