posted on 2021-07-23, 16:38authored byOrly Ben-Yacov, Anastasia Godneva, Michal Rein, Smadar Shilo, Dmitry Kolobkov, Netta Koren, Noa Cohen Dolev, Tamara Travinsky Shmul, Bat Chen Wolf, Noa Kosower, Keren Sagiv, Maya Lotan-Pompan, Niv Zmora, Adina Weinberger, Eran Elinav, Eran Segal
<b>OBJECTIVE</b> To compare the clinical effects of a Personalized Postprandial-Targeting (PPT) diet vs
a Mediterranean (MED) diet, on glycemic control and
metabolic health in prediabetes.
<p><b>RESEARCH DESIGN
AND METHODS </b>We randomly assigned adults with
prediabetes (n=225) to follow a MED diet or a PPT diet for a 6-month dietary
intervention and additional 6-month follow-up. The PPT diet relies on a
machine-learning algorithm that integrates clinical
and microbiome features to predict personal
postprandial-glucose-responses (PPGR). During the intervention, all
participants were connected to continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and
self-reported dietary intake using a smartphone application.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS </b>Among 225 participants randomized (58.7%
women; mean±SD age, 50±7 years; BMI, 31.3±5.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; HbA1c, 5.9±0.2% (41±2.4
mmol/mol);
fasting plasma glucose 114±12mg/dl [6.33±0.67 mmol/L]), 200 (89%)
completed the 6-month intervention. A total of 177 participants additionally
contributed 12-month follow-up data. Both interventions reduced the daily time
with glucose levels above 140 mg/dl (7.8 mmol/L) and HbA1c levels, but reductions
were significantly greater in PPT compared to MED. The mean 6-month change in ‘time
above 140 mg/dl (7.8 mmol/L)’ was -0.3±0.8 hour/day and -1.3±1.5 hour/day for MED
and PPT, respectively (95% CI between-group difference, -1.29 to -0.66;
p<0.001). The
mean 6-month change in HbA1c was -0.08±0.19%
(-0.9±2.1 mmol/mol) and -0.16±0.24% (-1.7±2.6 mmol/mol) for MED and PPT,
respectively (95% CI between-group difference, -0.14 to -0.02; p=0.007). The significant
between-group differences maintained at 12-month follow-up. No
significant differences were noted between the groups in an oral glucose
tolerance test (OGTT, CGM-measured). </p>
<b>CONCLUSIONS
</b>In
this clinical trial in prediabetes,<b> </b>a PPT diet improved glycemic control
significantly more than a MED diet as measured by daily time of glucose levels
above 140 mg/dl (7.8 mmol/L) and HbA1c. These findings may have implications to
dietary advice in clinical practice.
Funding
The funding for the study was provided jointly by the companies Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and DayTwo.