American Diabetes Association
Browse

Lipidomic markers of processed meat and unprocessed red meat intake and risk of diabetes in American Indians

figure
posted on 2025-04-23, 19:38 authored by Xiaoxiao Wen, Guanhong Miao, Amanda M. Fretts, Mingjing Chen, Ying Zhang, Jason G Umans, Shelley A. Cole, Lyle G. Best, Oliver Fiehn, Jinying Zhao

Objective: To identify lipidomic markers of habitual unprocessed red meat and processed meat intake and evaluate their associations with diabetes risk in American Indians.

Research Design and Methods: We studied 1,816 participants from the Strong Heart Family Study. Using untargeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, we quantified 1,542 lipids (518 known) in fasting plasma at baseline and follow-up (~5 years apart). Meat intake was assessed via Food Frequency Questionnaires. Mixed-effects linear regression was used to identify lipids associated with meat consumption. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to examine whether these lipids were associated with incident diabetes, independent of conventional risk factors, or with longitudinal glucose/insulin metrics.

Results: Of 1,076 participants with normal baseline glucose, 66 developed diabetes. After multiple testing correction, 15 known lipids, primarily plasmalogens, were associated with unprocessed red meat intake. Three plasmalogens were linked to incident diabetes (OR [95% CI]: 1.32 [1.02–1.70] to 1.39 [1.08–1.78] per SD increase in baseline levels) and higher red meat intake. Eight lipids, mainly sphingomyelins, were associated with processed meat intake. Two sphingomyelins were linked to incident diabetes (OR [95% CI]: 1.33 [1.02–1.75] and 1.36 [1.04–1.80]) and higher processed meat intake. Of 23 meat-related lipids, 20 were associated with altered glucose/insulin metrics, and 11 mediated positive associations between red or processed meat intake and fasting glucose.

Conclusion: We identified lipidomic markers of unprocessed red and processed meat consumption. Several lipids were independently associated with increased diabetes risk, potentially by mediating the association between meat intake and glucose metabolism.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Institute of Health (NIH) grant R01DK107532 (JZ). The authors thank the Strong Heart Study (SHS) participants, Indian Health Service (IHS) facilities, and participating Tribal communities for their extraordinary cooperation and involvement, which has contributed to the success of the SHS. The SHS has been funded in whole or in part with federal funds from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institute of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, under contract numbers 75N92019D00027, 75N92019D00028, 75N92019D00029, & 75N92019D00030. The study was previously supported by research grants: R01HL109315, R01HL109301, R01HL109284, R01HL109282, and R01HL109319 and by cooperative agreements: U01HL41642, U01HL41652, U01HL41654, U01HL65520, and U01HL65521. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or the HIS. J.Z. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

History

Usage metrics

    Diabetes Care

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC