American Diabetes Association
Browse
- No file added yet -

Glycemic and Psychosocial Outcomes of Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop Therapy in Youth with High HbA1c: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Download (87.74 kB)
figure
posted on 2024-09-13, 15:18 authored by Mary B Abraham, Grant J Smith, Julie Dart, Antony D. Clarke, Keely Bebbington, Janice M Fairchild, Geoffrey R Ambler, Fergus J Cameron, Elizabeth A. Davis, Timothy W Jones

Objective

To determine the efficacy of advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) therapy in a high-risk cohort of youth on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII)+/-continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with suboptimal glycemia.

Research Design and Methods

In a 6-month multicentre clinical trial, youth with type 1 diabetes with mean and most recent HbA1c > 8.5%(65mmol/mol) were randomly assigned 1:1 to AHCL or treatment as usual (CSII+/-CGM). The primary outcome was the 24-week between-group difference in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes included CGM metrics from masked CGM and psychological measures (youth-reported problem areas in diabetes (PAID), quality of life, anxiety, depression and hypoglycemia fear) assessed using validated questionnaires.

Results

A total of 42 participants were randomized [mean(SD) age 16.2(2.5) years, HbA1c 9.8 (1.1)% or 84(12)mmol/mol, PAID score 50.3(19.8)]. At study end, the mean (SD) HbA1c was 8.8(1.1)% or 73(12)mmol/mol with AHCL and 9.9(1.2)% or 85(13.1)mmol/mol with CSII ± CGM, with mean adjusted group difference of -0.77%(95% CI,-1.45 to -0.09) or -8.4 mmol/mol(-15.8 to -1.0)];p=0.027). AHCL increased time in range 70-180 mg/dl (difference 19.1%; 95% CI, 11.1 to 27.1), reduced time >180 mg/dl (difference -17.7 %; 95% CI,-26.6 to -8.8), with no increase in time spent <70 mg/dl (difference -0.8%; 95% CI,-2.7 to 0.6). There was no evidence for difference in psychosocial outcomes between the two groups at study end.

Conclusions

AHCL should be encouraged in youth with suboptimal glycemia as AHCL improves glycemia. However, psychological support remains vital as technology alone may not be able to reduce the burden of diabetes care in this subgroup.


Funding

The study was funded by JDRF Australia Type 1 Diabetes Clinical Research Network (4-SRA-2016-350-M-B), a Special Research Initiative of the Australian Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council (ID APP1078190). In-kind support was provided by Medtronic through the provision of insulin pumps, sensors, and transmitters for the study. Roche Diabetes Care provided the glucometers for the study. JDRF Australia provided input into the study design. The funders of the trial had no role in collection, analysis and interpretation of the data and in manuscript preparation. M.B.A was supported by the Department of Health/Raine Clinical Research Fellowship from Western Australia.

History

Usage metrics

    Diabetes Care

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC