American Diabetes Association
Browse
IMAGE
Supplementary_figure_1.png (270.03 kB)
DOCUMENT
Supplemental_figure_1_legend.pdf (38.7 kB)
DOCUMENT
Supplementary_Table_1.pdf (112.65 kB)
1/0
3 files

Glucose Regulation Beyond HbA1c in Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Insulin: Real-World Evidence From the DIALECT-2 Cohort

figure
posted on 2021-07-22, 16:12 authored by Niala den Braber, Miriam M.R. Vollenbroek-Hutten, Kathryn M. Westerik, Stephan J.L. Bakker, Gerjan Navis, Bert-Jan F. van Beijnum, Gozewijn D. Laverman
OBJECTIVE To investigate glucose variations associated with HbA1c in insulin treated patients with type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Patients included in the Diabetes and Lifestyle Cohort Twente (DIALECT)-2 (n=79) were categorized in three HbA1c categories: low, intermediate and high (≤ 53; 54–62 and ≥ 63 mmol/mol or ≤ 7, 7.1–7.8, ≥ 7.9%). Blood glucose time in range (TIR), time below range (TBR), time above range (TAR), glucose variability parameters, day and night duration and frequency of TBR and TAR episodes were determined by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), using the FreeStyle Libre sensor and compared between HbA1c categories.

RESULTS CGM was performed for a median [interquartile range] of 10 [7-12] days/ patient. TIR was not different for low and intermediate HbA1c categories: (76.8% [68.3–88.2] vs 76.0% [72.5.0–80.1]), whereas in the low category TBR was higher and TAR lower (7.7% [2.4–19.1] vs 0.7% [0.3–6.1], and 8.2% [5.7–17.6] vs 20.4% [11.6–27.0], respectively, p < 0.05). Patients in the highest HbA1c category had lower TIR (52.7% [40.9–67.3]) and higher TAR (44.1% [27.8–57.0]) than the other HbA1c categories (p < 0.05), but did not have less TBR during the night. All patients had more (0.06 ± 0.06/h vs 0.03 ± 0.03/h, p = 0.002) and longer (88.0 [45.0–195.5] vs 53.4 [34.4–82.8] minutes, p < 0.001) TBR episodes during the night than during the day.

CONCLUSIONS In this study, a high HbA1c did not reduce the occurrence of nocturnal hypoglycemia and low HbA1c was not associated with the highest TIR. Optimal personalization of glycemic control requires the use of newer tools, including CGM-derived parameters.

Funding

This research was financially supported by an unrestricted research grant from the Pioneers in Health Care Innovation Fund established by the University of Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente and ZiekenhuisGroep Twente, by the ZGT hospital research fund, and by the Dutch Diabetes Research Foundation (grant No. 2017.30.005). N.B. is appointed by the grant Exceptional and Deep Intelligent Coach (EDIC, grant No. 628.011.021) financed by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO).

History