Genetically predicted glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) levels and cardiovascular disease risk are driven by distinct causal variants in the GIPR region
Version 2 2021-09-08, 21:51Version 2 2021-09-08, 21:51
Version 1 2021-08-23, 11:11Version 1 2021-08-23, 11:11
figure
posted on 2021-09-08, 21:51authored byNicholas Bowker, Robert Hansford, Stephen Burgess, Christopher N. Foley, Victoria P.W. Auyeung, A. Mesut Erzurumluoglu, Isobel D. Stewart, Eleanor Wheeler, Maik Pietzner, Fiona Gribble, Frank Reimann, Pallav Bhatnagar, Matthew P. Coghlan, Nicholas J. Wareham, Claudia Langenberg
<p><a></a><a>There is
considerable interest in GIPR agonism to enhance the insulinotropic and
extra-pancreatic effects of GIP, thereby improving glycaemic and weight control
in type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity. Recent genetic epidemiological evidence
has implicated higher GIPR-mediated GIP levels in raising coronary artery
disease (CAD) risk, a potential safety concern for GIPR agonism. We therefore
aimed to quantitatively assess whether the association between higher GIPR-mediated
fasting GIP levels and CAD risk is mediated via GIPR or is instead the result
of linkage disequilibrium (LD) confounding between variants at the <i>GIPR</i> locus.
Using Bayesian multi-trait colocalisation, we identified a <i>GIPR</i> missense
variant rs1800437 (G allele; E354) as the putatively causal variant shared
between fasting GIP levels, glycaemic traits and adiposity-related traits (posterior
probability for colocalisation, PP<sub>coloc</sub>>0.97; PP explained by the
candidate variant; PP<sub>explained</sub>=1) that was independent from a
cluster of CAD and lipid traits driven by a known missense variant in <i>APOE</i>
(rs7412; distance to E354 ~770Kb; R<sup>2</sup> with E354 = 0.004; PP<sub>coloc</sub>>0.99;
PP<sub>explained</sub>=1). Further, conditioning the association between E354
and CAD on the residual LD with rs7412, we observed slight attenuation in
association, but it remained significant (OR per copy of E354 after adjustment
1.03; 95% CI, 1.02, 1.04; P=0.003). Instead, E354’s association with CAD was
completely attenuated when conditioning on an additional established CAD
signal, rs1964272, (R<sup>2</sup> with E354=0.27), an intronic variant in <i>SNRPD2</i>
(OR for E354 after adjustment for rs1964272: 1.01; 95% CI, 0.99, 1.03; P=0.06).
We demonstrate that associations with GIP, anthropometric and glycaemic traits
are driven by distinct genetic signals from those driving CAD and lipid traits
in the <i>GIPR</i> region, and higher E354-mediated
fasting GIP levels are not associated with CAD risk. These findings provide
evidence that the inclusion of GIPR agonism in dual GIPR/GLP-1R agonists could
potentiate the protective effect of GLP-1 agonists on diabetes without undue CAD
risk, an aspect which has yet to be assessed in clinical trials.</a></p>
Funding
The EPIC-Norfolk study (https://doi.org/10.22025/2019.10.105.00004) has received funding from the Medical Research Council (MRC) (MR/N003284/1 and MC-UU_12015/1) and Cancer Research UK (C864/A14136). The genetics work in the EPIC-Norfolk study was funded by the MRC (MC_PC_13048). The Fenland Study (10.22025/2017.10.101.00001) is funded by the MRC (MC_UU_12015/1). We further acknowledge support for genomics and metabolomics from the MRC (MC_PC_13046). Fiona Gribble and Frank Reimann acknowledge funding by Wellcome (106262/Z/14/Z and 106263/Z/14/Z) and MRC (MRC_MC_UU_12012/3).