American Diabetes Association
Browse

Effects of adopting preventive drug lists on medication costs and disparities by income over 2 years: a Natural Experiment for Translation in Diabetes (NEXT-D) Study

Download (916.25 kB)
figure
posted on 2024-10-08, 16:59 authored by Christine Y. Lu, Stephanie Argetsinger, Matthew Lakoma, Fang Zhang, J. Frank Wharam, Dennis Ross-Degnan

Objective: Examine the association between Preventive Drug Lists (PDLs) and changes in medication costs among patients with diabetes insured in commercial health plans over two follow-up years.

Research Design and Methods: Quasi-experimental study using Optum’s de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database (01/2003-12/2017). The intervention group included 5582 patients with diabetes age 12-64 years switched by employers to PDL coverage; the control group included 5582 matched patients whose employers offered no PDL. Outcomes included out-of-pocket costs, standardized costs, and 30-day fills for all medications because PDL-associated savings could be used to pay for medicines in other classes and for five therapeutic classes covered by the PDLs (oral diabetic medications, insulins, test strips, antihypertensive drugs, and lipid-lowering drugs).

Results: Pre-to-post out-of-pocket spending for all medications declined by 29.7% in follow-up year 2 (95% CI: -36.0%, -23.4%) among PDL members relative to controls. Higher-income and lower-income PDL members experienced significant reductions in out-of-pocket spending for all medications in year 2 (30%), and for key therapeutic classes (range -23% to -67%). We found significant increases in utilization of key therapeutic classes in the overall population (range 8-15%), and in higher-income and lower-income PDL members (range 9-50%).

Conclusions: PDLs offer an effective strategy for employers and insurers to lower member cost-sharing and encourage increased use of important medications to prevent or manage chronic illnesses. For patients with diabetes, especially those with lower incomes, PDL coverage resulted in substantial and persistent reductions in out-of-pocket medication costs, medication use increases, and some increased use of more expensive products.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) (5U18DP006122) and the NIDDK Health Delivery Systems Centre for Diabetes Translational Research (1P30-DK092924). The funding institutes did not have any role in study design; collection; analysis; interpretation of data; writing the report; or the decision to submit the report for publication.

History

Usage metrics

    Diabetes Care

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC