<b>OBJECTIVE</b>: To
assess the interactions between diet quality and genetic predisposition to
incident type 2 diabetes (T2D).
<p><b>RESEARCH
DESIGN AND METHODS:</b><b> </b>357,419
participants with genetic and complete dietary data from the UK Biobank, were
enrolled between 2006 and 2010 and were prospectively followed up to 2017.<b> </b><a>The genetic risk score (GRS) was calculated on the basis of
424 variants associated with T2D risk and a higher GRS indicates a higher
genetic predisposition to T2D. </a>The adherence to a healthy diet was assessed
by a diet quality score comprising of 10 important dietary components, with a higher score representing a higher overall
diet quality.<b></b></p>
<p><b>RESULTS<a>:</a></b> 5,663 incident T2D cases were documented
during an average of 8.1 years of follow-up. A significant negative interaction
was observed between GRS and diet quality score. After adjusting for major risk
factors, per SD increment in GRS and diet quality score was associated with a 54%
higher and a 9% lower risk of T2D, respectively. Besides, a simultaneous
increment of 1 SD in both diet quality score and GRS was additionally associated
with a 3% lower T2D risk due to the antagonistic interaction. In categorical
analyses, a sharp reduction of 23% in T2D risk associated with 1 SD increment
in diet quality score was detected among participants in the extremely high GRS
group (GRS>95%). We also observed a strong negative interaction between GRS
and diet quality score on blood HbA1c level at baseline (P<0.001).</p>
<b>CONCLUSIONS: </b>The adherence to a healthy diet was associated with more
reductions in blood HbA1c levels
and subsequent T2D risk among
individuals with higher genetic risk. Our
findings support tailoring dietary recommendations to an individual’s genetic
makeup for T2D prevention.
Funding
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81773419), China National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant no. 2020M681869). The funders had no role in design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.