American Diabetes Association
Browse

Developing a Computable Phenotype for Identifying Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults with Diabetes using Electronic Health Records in the DiCAYA Network

figure
posted on 2025-03-31, 17:55 authored by Hui Shao, Lorna E. Thorpe, Shahidul Islam, Jiang Bian, Yi Guo, Piaopiao Li, Sarah Bost, Dana Dabelea, Rebecca Conway, Tessa Crume, Brian S. Schwartz, Annemarie G. Hirsch, Katie S. Allen, Brian E. Dixon, Shaun J. Grannis, Eva Lustigova, Kristi Reynolds, Marc Rosenman, Victor W Zhong, Anthony Wong, Pedro Rivera, Thuy Le, Meredith Akerman, Sarah Conderino, Anand Rajan, Angela D. Liese, Caroline Rudisill, Jihad S. Obeid, Joseph A. Ewing, Charles Bailey, Eneida A. Mendonca, Ibrahim Zaganjor, Deborah Rolka, Giuseppina Imperatore, Meda E Pavkov, Jasmin Divers

Objective: The Diabetes in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults (DiCAYA) network seeks to create a nationwide electronic health record (EHR)-based diabetes surveillance system. This study aimed to develop a DiCAYA-wide EHR-based CP to identify prevalent cases of diabetes.

Research Design and Methods: We conducted network-wide chart reviews on 2,134 youth (age < 18y) and 2,466 young adults (age 18 – <45 y) among people with possible diabetes. Within this population, we compared the performance of three alternative CPs, using diabetes diagnoses determined by chart review as the gold standard. CPs were evaluated based on their accuracy in identifying diabetes and its subtype.

Results: The final DiCAYA CP requires at least one diabetes diagnosis code from clinical encounters. Subsequently, diabetes type classification was based on the ratio of type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) diagnosis codes in the EHR. For both youth and young adults, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) in finding diabetes cases were above 90%, except for the specificity and NPV in young adults, which were slightly lower at 83.8% and 80.6%, respectively. The final DiCAYA CP achieved over 90% sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV in classifying T1D, while demonstrating lower but robust performance in identifying T2D, consistently maintaining above 80% across metrics.

Conclusions: The DiCAYA CP effectively identifies overall diabetes and T1D in youth and young adults, though T2D misclassification in youth highlights areas for refinements. Its simplicity enables broad deployment across diverse EHR systems for diabetes surveillance.

Funding

This work was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institute for Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. U18DP006521 Children’s Hospital of Pennsylvania, U18DP006512 University of Florida, U18DP006509 Geisinger, U18DP006500 Indiana University– Purdue University at Indianapolis, U18DP006513 University of South Carolina, U18DP006506 Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, U18DP006693 Lurie Children’s, U18DP006694 Lurie Children’s, U18DP006517 University of Colorado Component-A, U18DP006518 University of Colorado Component-B, U18DP006510 NYU Long Island School of Medicine.

History

Usage metrics

    Diabetes Care

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC