posted on 2020-07-08, 17:51authored byMugdha Gokhale, Stacie B. Dusetzina, Virginia Pate, Danielle S Chun, John B. Buse, Til Stürmer, Emily Gower
<a><b>Objectives</b></a>: <a>Using the 2016 Medicare
part D coverage gap as an example, we explored effects of increased out-of-pocket
costs on adherence to branded </a>dipeptidyl
peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) in patients without financial subsidies, relative to subsidized patients who do not
experience increased spending during the gap. We also explored seasonality of re-initiation,
as discontinuers may be more likely to reinitiate in January when benefits
reset.
<p><b>Methods: </b>DPP-4i or
sulfonylureas initiators, aged <u>></u>66 years, from a 20% sample of 2015-2016
Medicare claims were identified. We used difference-in-differences Poisson
regression to compare adherence before and after entering the coverage gap
between non-subsidized and subsidized patients. Among discontinuers, monthly
hazard ratios (HRs) for re-initiation relative to January 2016 were derived with
Cox models. As a second control, we repeated analyses using
sulfonylureas, generic low-cost alternatives.</p>
<p><b>Results</b>: In 2016, 8,096 subsidized
and 6,173 non-subsidized DPP-4i initiators entered the coverage gap. Non-subsidized patients,
copayment in the coverage gap was 45% ($227 per DPP-4i prescription), and adherence
decreased from 68.4% to 49.0% after gap entry.
Accounting for adherence differences in subsidized patients, non-subsidized
patients demonstrated reduced adherence to DPP-4is [Difference-in-difference:-16.9%;CI(-18.7%,-15.1%)]
but not sulfonylureas [-1.6%(-3.4%,0.2%)]. Re-initiation was lowest in the
months before January (HR=0.4-0.5) among non-subsidized DPP-4i patients,
demonstrating a strong seasonal pattern. </p>
<p><b>Conclusions: </b>Increased
out-of-pocket costs negatively affect adherence and re-initiation of branded
antihyperglycemic drugs among patients without financial subsidies. Despite closure
of the coverage gap, affordability remains a concern given increasing list
prices for many drugs on Medicare and the growing use of deductibles and
coinsurance by commercial health plans. <b></b></p>
Funding
This work was supported by the following - The Medicare database infrastructure used for this was funded by the Pharmacoepidemiology Gillings Innovation Lab (PEGIL) for the Population-Based Evaluation of Drug Benefits and Harms in Older US Adults (GIL200811.0010), the Center for Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Epidemiology, UNC’s Clinical Translational Science Award (UL1TR002489), the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, and the School of Medicine. The development of the state-of-the art nonexperimental methodology was supported by an ongoing grant from the National Institute on Aging (R01 AG056479).