Comparative Safety of Sodium–Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors Versus Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors and Sulfonylureas on the Risk of Diabetic Ketoacidosis
posted on 2022-02-11, 16:32authored byGhadeer K. Dawwas, James H. Flory, Sean Hennessy, Charles E. Leonard, James D. Lewis
<b>Objective:
</b>To assess the association
of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors with diabetic
ketoacidosis compared to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors and
sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes.
<p><b>Research
Design and Methods </b></p>
<p>We conducted a new-user active comparator
cohort study design. We examined
two pairwise comparisons: 1) SGLT2 inhibitors vs. DPP4 inhibitors and 2) SGLT2
inhibitors vs. sulfonylureas. The
main outcome was<b> </b>diabetic
ketoacidosis present on hospital admission. We adjusted for confounders via
propensity score matching. We used Cox proportional-hazards regression with a
robust variance estimator to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95%
confidence intervals (CIs) while adjusting for calendar time. </p>
<p><b>Results:</b> In cohort 1 (n= 85,125 for SGLT2 inhibitors and
n= 85,125 for DPP-4 inhibitors), the incidence rates of diabetic ketoacidosis per
1000 person-years were 6.0 and 4.3 for SGLT2 inhibitors and DPP4 inhibitors,
respectively. In cohort 2 (n= 72,436 for SGLT2 inhibitors and n= 72,436 for sulfonylureas),
the incidence rates of diabetic ketoacidosis per 1000 person-years were 6.3 and
4.5 for SGLT2 inhibitors and sulfonylureas, respectively. In Cox
proportional-hazards models, the use of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with a
higher rate of diabetic ketoacidosis compared to DPP4 inhibitors (adjusted HR
(aHR), 1.63; 95% CI 1.36–1.96) and sulfonylureas (aHR, 1.56; 95% CI 1.30–1.87).
</p>
<p><b>Conclusions</b>: In this comparative safety study using
real-world data, patients with type 2 diabetes who were newly prescribed SGLT2
inhibitors had a higher rate of diabetic ketoacidosis compared to DPP4
inhibitors and sulfonylureas. Clinicians should be vigilant about this association. </p>